A philosophy that promotes organizational strategies which support the systematic use of partnerships and problem-solving techniques to proactively address the immediate conditions that give rise to public safety issues such as crime, social disorder, and fear of crime. It differs from traditional policing by emphasizing collaboration with the public.
This approach shifts police focus from reactive response to proactive engagement, building trust and shared responsibility with residents.
Card 2
Broken Windows Theory
Answer
A criminological theory that suggests that visible signs of crime, anti-social behavior, and civil disorder create an urban environment that encourages further crime and disorder. Addressing minor infractions can prevent more serious crimes.
The theory posits that a broken window left unrepaired signals that no one cares, leading to more broken windows and eventually more serious decay and crime.
Card 3
Probable Cause
Answer
A reasonable belief, based on facts and circumstances, that a crime has been committed or that evidence of a crime exists in a particular location. It is a higher standard than reasonable suspicion but lower than proof beyond a reasonable doubt.
Law enforcement must establish probable cause before they can conduct a lawful search or make an arrest without a warrant.
Card 4
Search Warrant
Answer
A legal document, issued by a judge or magistrate, that authorizes law enforcement officers to conduct a search of a person, location, or vehicle for evidence of a crime. It specifies the place to be searched and the items to be seized.
The Fourth Amendment generally requires a warrant, based on probable cause, to protect individuals from unreasonable searches and seizures.
Card 5
Police Discretion
Answer
The power of a police officer to make decisions on whether to intervene in a situation, how to intervene, or whether to enforce a particular law. This discretion is exercised within the bounds of law and policy.
An officer may choose to issue a warning for a minor traffic violation instead of a ticket, demonstrating their discretionary power.
Card 6
Fourth Amendment
Answer
An amendment to the U.S. Constitution that protects people from unreasonable searches and seizures by the government. It requires that warrants be issued only upon probable cause and describe with particularity the place to be searched and the persons or things to be seized.
This amendment is crucial for safeguarding individual privacy against arbitrary government intrusion, establishing the need for warrants or specific exceptions.
Card 7
Adversarial System
Answer
A legal system, like that in the United States, where two opposing sides (prosecution and defense) present their arguments, evidence, and witnesses before a neutral judge or jury. The judge or jury determines the truth and applies the law.
This system assumes that the truth will emerge from the competition between the opposing parties, each advocating for their own side.
Card 8
Grand Jury
Answer
A group of citizens impaneled to hear preliminary evidence in a criminal case and determine whether there is sufficient probable cause to issue an indictment. It does not determine guilt or innocence.
Unlike a trial jury, a grand jury's role is investigative, deciding only if formal charges (an indictment) should be brought against a suspect.
Card 9
Plea Bargaining
Answer
A negotiation process between the prosecutor, defense attorney, and sometimes the defendant, where the defendant agrees to plead guilty to a lesser charge or to fewer charges in exchange for a more lenient sentence. It avoids a full trial.
Plea bargains are common because they save court resources, reduce uncertainty for both sides, and can result in a lighter sentence for the defendant.
Card 10
Appellate Court
Answer
A court that reviews decisions made by lower trial courts to determine if legal errors were made during the trial process. It does not typically hear new evidence or testimony but reviews legal arguments and trial records.
If a defendant believes their constitutional rights were violated or a judge made an incorrect legal ruling, they can appeal to a higher court.
Card 11
Concurrent Jurisdiction
Answer
The situation where two or more courts have the authority to hear the same type of case, often involving both state and federal courts for certain crimes. It is distinct from exclusive jurisdiction, where only one court system can hear a case.
A crime like drug trafficking across state lines might violate both state and federal laws, allowing prosecution in either jurisdiction.
Card 12
Recidivism
Answer
The tendency of a convicted criminal to reoffend, often measured by rearrest, reconviction, or reincarceration within a specific time frame after release. It is a key metric for evaluating the effectiveness of correctional programs.
High recidivism rates indicate that current correctional strategies may not be effectively rehabilitating individuals or deterring future criminal behavior.
Card 13
Probation
Answer
A sentencing alternative where an offender is released into the community under the supervision of a probation officer, subject to certain conditions instead of incarceration. It is a sentence imposed by a court.
Probation allows offenders to remain in society while still being monitored and held accountable, often with conditions like drug testing or community service.
Card 14
Parole
Answer
The conditional release of a prisoner from incarceration after serving a portion of their sentence, under the supervision of a parole officer and subject to specific conditions. It is an administrative decision by a parole board, not a court.
Parole differs from probation because it occurs after a period of imprisonment, whereas probation is typically given in lieu of imprisonment.
Card 15
Determinate Sentencing
Answer
A sentencing model where the offender is sentenced to a fixed term of incarceration, which may be reduced by good time but is not subject to review by a parole board. The judge sets a specific sentence length.
This model aims for consistency and predictability in sentencing, reducing judicial discretion in setting the exact length of time served.
Card 16
Indeterminate Sentencing
Answer
A sentencing model where the offender is sentenced to a range of time (e.g., 5-10 years), with the actual release date determined by a parole board based on the offender's behavior and readiness for release. It emphasizes rehabilitation.
This model allows for flexibility, aiming to release offenders when they are deemed rehabilitated, rather than at a fixed point in time.
Card 17
Restorative Justice
Answer
An approach to justice that focuses on repairing the harm caused by crime by involving victims, offenders, and the community in a process that seeks to address the needs of all parties. It emphasizes reconciliation and reintegration.
Instead of solely punishing the offender, restorative justice seeks to heal the wounds caused by crime and prevent future harm through dialogue and restitution.
Card 18
Mens Rea
Answer
The 'guilty mind' or criminal intent, which refers to the mental state of the defendant at the time the crime was committed. It is a necessary element for most crimes, alongside actus reus.
Proving mens rea differentiates accidental harm from intentional harm, such as distinguishing murder from an accidental death.
Card 19
Actus Reus
Answer
The 'guilty act' or the physical act of committing a crime. It refers to the voluntary wrongful deed that constitutes a crime, as distinguished from the mental state (mens rea).
For most crimes, both a guilty act and a guilty mind must be present; merely thinking about a crime is not sufficient for criminal liability.
Card 20
Strict Liability
Answer
A legal concept where a person can be held liable for committing an act, regardless of their mental state or intent. For these offenses, the prosecution only needs to prove that the actus reus occurred.
Traffic violations, such as speeding, are often strict liability offenses; intent to speed is not required for a conviction, only the act of speeding.
Card 21
Felony
Answer
A serious crime, typically punishable by imprisonment for more than one year or by death. Examples include murder, rape, and robbery.
Felonies carry severe consequences, often resulting in loss of civil rights like voting or gun ownership upon conviction.
Card 22
Misdemeanor
Answer
A less serious crime, typically punishable by a fine, incarceration for less than one year in a local jail, or probation. Examples include petty theft, simple assault, and public intoxication.
Misdemeanors are distinguished from felonies by their less severe penalties and their impact on an individual's criminal record.
Card 23
Self-Defense
Answer
A legal justification or affirmative defense where an individual uses a reasonable amount of force, including deadly force, to protect themselves or others from imminent harm. The force used must be proportionate to the perceived threat.
This defense acknowledges that individuals have a right to protect themselves when faced with an immediate and serious threat, negating criminal culpability.
Card 24
Due Process
Answer
A fundamental constitutional guarantee that all legal proceedings will be fair and that one will be given notice of the proceedings and an opportunity to be heard before one's life, liberty, or property is taken. It is protected by the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments.
Due process ensures that the government must respect all legal rights owed to a person, providing fair treatment through the judicial system.
Card 25
Miranda Warning
Answer
A statement that law enforcement officers are required to read to a person in custody before questioning them, informing them of their Fifth Amendment rights to remain silent and to an attorney. Failure to issue the warning can result in the exclusion of statements made.
The Miranda warning ensures that individuals understand their constitutional rights during custodial interrogation, preventing self-incrimination.
Card 26
Habeas Corpus
Answer
A writ (legal order) requiring a person under arrest to be brought before a judge or into court, especially to secure the person's release unless lawful grounds are shown for their detention. It is a fundamental safeguard against illegal imprisonment.
This right allows individuals to challenge the legality of their detention, ensuring they are not held indefinitely without due process.
Card 27
Arraignment
Answer
A formal court proceeding where a criminal defendant is brought before a judge, informed of the charges against them, and asked to enter a plea (guilty, not guilty, or nolo contendere). It typically follows an indictment or information.
This is a critical stage where the defendant formally responds to the charges, setting the course for future legal proceedings like trial or plea bargaining.
Card 28
Double Jeopardy
Answer
A constitutional protection under the Fifth Amendment that prevents an individual from being prosecuted or punished twice for the same offense after an acquittal or conviction. It does not apply to separate offenses arising from the same act.
If a person is found not guilty of robbery, the state cannot try them again for that same robbery, protecting them from repeated harassment by the government.